Moral Law According To Kant Essay -- Morality Ethics Kant Philosophy E

Moral Law According To KantImmanuel Kant was a deontologist from Germany in the eithteenth century. He believed that the only(prenominal) test of whether a conclusion is right or wrong is whether it could be applied to everyone. Would it be all right for everyone to do what you atomic number 18 doing? If not, your decision is wrong. It would be wrong, for example, to make a promise with the intention of breaking it because if everyone did that, no one would believe anyones promises. In ethics, Kant tried to show that doing ones duty consisted in following only those principles that one would accept as applying equally to all. Kant objects to the highest degree of all to the principle that ones own happiness tooshie be the fuse of morality. He rejects this possibility because swell-being is not always proportionate to gross(a) behavior. By this I mean that one mans well being is not always universal to all. Most significantly, Kant renounces happiness as the principle of moral ity because it obliterates the specific difference between virtue and vices. universality is the form of a moral law whereby all rational beings are subject to the same condition as the basis of morality. Kant argues that there can be principles for action that do not admit of exceptions, and that this occurs through operable reason. In other words, the possibility for morality does not hinge on the empirical world, but rather is a feature of the nature of the entity that is the install for morality. Since all rational...