Human’s Identity in a Globalized World

Salomon Djakpa Professor Ralph Satterthwaite English 14-001 17 March 2013 Humans Identity in a Globalized land globoseization has mystify a highly debated concept around the world. globalisation stand be simply understood as a parade ofglobal economical, political and ethnical integration (thefreedictionary. com). To twenty-four hours the world has become global and integral and all of its major parts be entirely interconnected homogeneous in a tiny village. Globalization is an habitual process that brings a cultural unification and changes the great unwasheds psychology.Globalization is natural event almost everywhere in the world and having various impacts on people. It is a process that is bringing the world smaller and smaller and also wondrous a change on peoples cultural level. bulks individualism operator is changing because of globalisation. Globalization has made the world we atomic number 18 living today more labyrinthine and culturally pluralized. Many pe ople emigrate to tonicfangled places and are forced to adopt a sunrise(prenominal) culture. However, their traditions might not fade away because they will always be part of their identity.Certain people believe that there is a connection mingled with globalization and Americanization. However, in his move Globalization vs. Americanization, Andrew slam argues that there is a difference between globalization and Americanization even though it is any(prenominal) quantifys herculean to make that distinction. His essay interprets the divergences among cultures in the twenty-first century and how living in this century has blurred those distinctions. In his essay, thresh uses his own life puzzle to tell how globalization has changed his behaviors, thoughts and feelings.He believes that mans identity is in involution as a takings of globalization. Many people often migrate to a new place and their identity becomes disturbed as a result of this dislocation. I believe Lams ass ertion can be true and totally agree with it because people can scat to follow their own culture as easy as their new culture. Andrew Lam argues that mans identity is in conflict as a result of globalization because of how it changed and disturbed peoples identity. Although soulfulnesss identity is very precious and memorable, it can be hreatened at any time because of globalization. Lam stated To want to be root is a deep gentleman desire, of course, but to be displaced and uprooted, alas, is a human condition Mans fate. alone over the world, people are moving from words to language, from culture to culture, sensibility to sensibility, negotiating across time zones and continents. Its a world that resists simplification. Mans identity is in conflict, has become both the cause of pain and fear for some and the source of enormous inspiration for others. I am inclined, of course, to be on the side of the latter. (par. 13)Lam is trying to show us that an individuals traditions, b ackground, floor and culture define him and to want to stay attached to his roots is a profound desire. However, your condition can alter at any time and lead you to move out of your place. All over the globe, people are switching accent, adopting a new culture and having new customs. These transformations are taking place in todays globalized world. Lam is also public debate that some people fear changing their identity while it is proficient a stimulus for others. The world is becoming more sophisticated and complex but less manageable.Furthermore, to support his claim, Andrew Lam demonstrates how the growing towns of ethnic enclaves are proliferating in America. They are rapidly changing the American culture. These homogenous and culturally distinct societies are challenging the old ideas of the melting pot and integration. He explains the concept of this pluralistic society that emerged because of globalization. He also maintains that globalization has created a new man with a talent and the ability to overcome remote identities by creating new interactions between them.A new man able to study contradictory ideas and resist the xenophobic and fundamentalistic views. Someone able to look into the world with its many ranges at the same time. Andrew Lam is a result of globalization. He grew up to be a patriotic citizen of South Vietnam. He followed his cultures tradition and promised that he would protect his homeland, but subsequent he had to migrate overseas to build a completely dissimilar life. As Lam noted, Yesterday my inheritance was simplethe sacred sift fields and rivers that defined who I was (par. 6).The country Lam was from defined him and his cultural traditions. He grew up to become a rice farmer like the past generation but after migrating to a new country his identity changed. This was his identity before the global transformation of migration. He was just now connected to the people who were in Vietnam but after travelling overse as he became aware that he had so many friends and relatives who lived in contrastive countries. His identity is today bound up with multiple communities. He well-read about aspects his friends had that were different from his.My own life experiences made me agree with Lams position. I migrated to the United States in search of the American dream. traveling from Africa to America, which once required months at sea, now only takes hours in the air. All of this is because of the process of globalization. Today my identity is bound with a new community. I can honestly say my identity is changing because my tongue is belatedly switching to the American language I have slowly follow the American culture. However, I follow my own culture as well.Due to migration, I have to learn a second language as well as a new culture. However, I still manage to lecture French, my first language. Today I have this deep belief in the American dream and also that miracles are real and one day there will be no more crime or violence. Migrating to this new country has showed me different perspectives of the world and varieties of teachings and moral support. My changing identity, new beliefs and my life as an immigrant are all experiences that make me accept Lams assertion.Globalization is one of the most contested concepts around the world and it has such(prenominal) a great impact on selves. Andrew Lam interprets in his essay globalization and its major effects on peoples identity. He clarifies that mans identity is in conflict because of globalization. He was himself a result of globalization after being affected by the global transformation of migration. He saw his behaviors, thoughts and feelings changing rapidly after moving. His pluralized identity is one reason that makes him feel that mans identity is in danger.I totally agree with Lams opinion because of my life experiences and how globalization has had a great impact on me. I really destine globalization has today t ransformed peoples identity in many ways. Many people migrate to new places and are in all probability to follow their culture as well as their new culture. Globalization has given people new traditions, perspectives of the world and customs. In todays globalized world, identity has become more conflicting than ever. Work Cited Lam, Andrew. Globalization vs. Americanization. AlterNet. (2004) 2. Web. 20 Feb. 2013.